|
HIGHLIGHTS |
ACAP
Template
Language for Employee Education on False Claims Recovery Now
Available
As mentioned in the last newsletter, ACAP contracted with Adam Falk,
Esq. of Feldesman, Tucker, Leifer, and Fidell, LLP to develop
template language for the employee education provisions of the False
Claims Act. Additionally, ACAP did a short summary of the January 11
CMS question and answer conference call on these provisions. These
materials are available in the Members Only section of our website.
(Members Only/False Claims Act.) These materials were reviewed with
the Compliance Officers on their January 24 roundtable. (See below
for a recap of the Compliance Officers call.)
|
|
PUBLIC POLICY AND ADVOCACY |
State of the Union
Addresses Health Care Issues
George W. Bush delivered the seventh State of the Union Address of
his presidency on January 23rd – and his first before a Congress
controlled entirely by the Democratic Party. Recognizing the new
political landscape on Capitol Hill, President Bush dedicated the
bulk of his address to domestic policies that the White House
believes may provide opportunities for the President and Democrats
to work together. These issues ranged from health care to
immigration to renewable energy. While many Democrats applauded
politely during the President’s speech, it is very clear that many
were holding their applause until they got more details about the
proposals. In fact, the luster seemed to be coming off many of
these proposals the day after the speech as many of the details
emerged.
Although many Democrats were particularly hopeful that the President
would move in their direction on expanding health insurance coverage
for the 47 million uninsured Americans, many of the emerging details
of the Administration proposal have already been shunned by the
Democratic Chairmen and Leadership. President Bush’s health care
proposal contained two elements. First, he proposed making all
health benefits taxable, with a standard tax deduction of $7,500 for
individuals and $15,000 for households. The value of any health
benefits above those amounts would be taxed as income. This
Administration believes that this would give individuals a tax
incentive to purchase health insurance through the individual
insurance market. According to the administration, 80% of the
workforce would receive a tax cut as a result of this proposal,
while 20%, those whom the administration described as having
“gold-plated health plans,” would have a tax increase. The second
element of the proposal is called the “Affordable Choices
Initiative.” The Affordable Choices Initiative “will direct Federal
funding to assist States in helping their poor and hard-to-insure
citizens afford private insurance.” The Administration would divert
funds from disproportionate share hospitals (DSH) to fund this
second element. The Administration notes that all proposals are
budget neutral. Democrats and others immediately criticized the tax
proposal as ill-conceived and dangerous. The basic critiques of the
policy fell along two lines: (1) it threatened the
employer-sponsored benefits provided to some workers while promoting
movement to the individual insurance market and (2) it provided
little real relief to the uninsured. While many Democrats applauded
President Bush for talking about the proposal, most decreed that it
was dead on arrival.
On Medicare, more information has been coming out the Democrats
approach to the Medicare Advantage program. At an Urban Institute
seminar on Private Plans in Medicare, Ways and Means Health
Subcommittee Chairman Pete Stark suggested that overpayments to
Medicare health plans offered an attractive pot of money for which
to offset new expenditures, notably Medicare payments to
physicians. The overpayments, which were criticized by Democrats
during the debate over the Medicare Modernization Act in 2003, have
always been a place where it was thought Democrats would look for
offsets or ways to save money in Medicare. Of course, we will have
to see how the debate emerges, but there is little doubt that
Medicare Advantage will be one source of funding offsets in the
months to come.
NHPRI Publishes Managed
Pharmacy Issue Brief as States Talk of Medicaid Drug Carve-Outs
Amid reports that numerous states are considering carving the
pharmacy benefit out of managed care contracts, Neighborhood Health
Plan of Rhode Island (NHPRI) has published an issue brief describing
the success of its own managed approach to the drug benefit, the
“managed pharmacy benefit.”
NHPRI defines the managed pharmacy benefit as an “evidence-based
approach to the selection of prescription drugs that promotes more
efficient and effective drug use among covered individuals.” The
benefit is founded on three key elements:
- Use of a formulary to direct prescribing toward more
efficacious drugs and to limit costs;
- Advice of a Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee, made
up of local providers and NHPRI practice managers, which
provides input on the selection of drugs to be included in the
formulary; and
- Availability of a fair and user-friendly exceptions
process to outline the circumstances under which a provider
can prescribe non-formulary drugs.
In addition, an emphasis on use of generic drugs over brand-name has
helped NHPRI save substantial funds. More than three-quarters of
prescriptions dispensed to NHPRI patients are for generic drugs,
topping fee-for service programs and commercial health plans, which
typically dispense 50 percent generic and 50 percent brand-name.
Despite the carve out threat in Rhode Island, NHPRI has been able to
control costs far more effectively than programs nationally. In
fact, while drug costs for NHPRI have increased only 3.5 percent
over three years, drug costs nationally have skyrocketed at the rate
of almost 13 percent during the same period.
ACAP is planning a conference call within the next weeks for plans
in states that are considering a drug carve out, and will develop a
plan of action accordingly.
Please contact Meg Murray at 202.331.4601 for further information.
http://www.nhpri.org/matriarch/documents/ManagedPharmacyBenefit.pdf
ACAP Sharing Services
In the
members only section of our website, there are several areas
that we want to remind you to look at periodically, including a
large section of shared documents, which includes disaster
recovery plans, compliance documents, job descriptions. We also
have several surveys we have done of our plans.
ACAP Signs Partnership
for Medicaid Letter Urging Health Priorities in Congress
ACAP signed a January letter drafted by the Partnership for Medicaid
entreating Congress to place a high priority on several safety net
health items. These items include:
- Preserve Medicaid’s integrity in any reform efforts,
- Reauthorize and fully fund the State Children Health
Insurance Program (SCHIP),
- Prevent cuts to Medicaid reimbursement for safety net
providers,
- Improve health care quality through care coordination,
including managed care,
- Strengthen oversight of section 1115 Medicaid waivers and
state plan amendments,
- Eliminate negative impact of Medicaid citizenship
documentation requirements, and
- Ensure access to Medicaid services for newborns.
The letter was distributed to members of Congress on January 25. The
letter is available on ACAP’s website.
CHCS Will Highlight
“Medicaid Best Buys” – Including Monroe Plan Strategy – During
February 5 Conference Call
On Monday, February 5, from 2 to 3:30 p.m. E.S.T., the Center for
Health Care Strategies (CHCS) will hold a policy briefing call to
highlight the recently-published Medicaid “Best Buys” for 2007. This
call will outline five promising opportunities to improve the health
of high-risk Medicaid beneficiaries and curb spending growth. States
adopting these strategies can lead the health care system in
providing cost-effective and high-quality care within Medicaid and
beyond.
The CHCS publication praised the Monroe Plan for their initiative in
the area of Care Management Program for High Risk Pregnancy “by
improving its prenatal outreach program for Medicaid members, the
Monroe Plan, a non-profit managed care organization in Rochester,
New York, dramatically reduced NICU admissions, saving $2 for each
dollar invested in the program.”
In this online event, the authors and panel of national experts will
discuss the five strategies outlined in the brief for both improving
the quality of services and curbing the growth in Medicaid
spending. States adopting these strategies could lead the health
care system in providing cost-effective and high-quality care within
Medicaid and beyond. The discussion will be moderated by Melanie
Bella, Senior Vice President of the Center for Health Care
Strategies. The panel includes:
- Stephen Goldsmith, Innovations in American
Government, Harvard's Kennedy School of Government
- Diane Rowland, Kaiser Family Foundation
- Dan Crippen, Former Director, Congressional Budget
Office
- MaryAnne Lindeblad, Washington State
- Ray Scheppach, National Governor's Association
(invited)
To register for the conference call, click link and answer the short
questionnaire.
http://www.innovations.harvard.edu/spotlight.html?id=182&preview=1
For the complete article, click link and download PDF file.
http://www.chcs.org/publications3960/publications_show.htm?doc_id=434341
|
|
EXCELLENCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY |
Recap: Medicare SNP
Roundtable Call
The Medicare SNP Directors had their first roundtable of the year on
January 18th. Beth Marootian from NHPRI led off a discussion about
staff training for Medicare. Beth and the other participants
discussed staff training at different phases of plan development,
including training for start up, on-going training, and future
approaches plans were considering.
ACAP Job Bank
ACAP plans can post job announcements in our job bank. Please
see our website for more details. You can email job
announcements to Christina Boye at
cboye@communityplans.net.
Recap: Compliance
Officers Roundtable
ACAP Compliance Officers had their first roundtable of the year on
January 24. On this call, Adam Falk, Esq. of Feldsman, Tucker,
Leifer and Fidell, LLP reviewed the template employee education
language for ACAP plans to use to satisfy the requirements of the
False Claims Act. The template employee education language, as well
as a summary of the January 11 CMS call on this topic, and the CMS
State Medicaid Directors letter on the False claims act, are
available on ACAP’s website. Go to Members Only/False Claims Act for
a list of materials. Compliance Officers also heard from Cory
Ludington, Compliance Officer at Community Health Network of
Connecticut, about the recent challenges the plan has seen under the
state’s Freedom of Information Act. The plan is in the process of
appealing requests considered proprietary to the Connecticut Supreme
Court.
Recap: Chief Operating
Officers Roundtable
ACAP COOs had their first roundtable of the year on January 25. On
this call, Jenny Babcock, ACAP’s Assistant Director for Policy,
presented highlights from a draft paper ACAP has produced on the
Citizen Documentation Requirements of the Deficit Reduction Act.
ACAP Policy Directors were also invited to participate in the call.
After reviewing key components of Citizen Documentation
Requirements, ACAP COOs and Policy Directors discussed the impact
these requirements have had on enrollment, re-enrollment and overall
membership.
Reminder: Chief
Financial Officers Roundtable
The next Chief Financial Officers Roundtable is Thursday, February 1
at 3 pm eastern time. An agenda and materials will be distributed
prior to the call.
Reminder: Chief Medical
Officers Roundtable
The next Chief Medical Officers Roundtable is Thursday, February 8
at 3 pm eastern time. An agenda and materials will be distributed
prior to the call.
|
|
NEWSFLASH |
CalRHIO Announces Grant
Opportunity for Safety Net Health Organizations
The California Regional Health Information Organization (CalRHIO)
announced that it will make $670,000 from the Blue Shield of
California Foundation available for grants to health care
organizations that work with low-income, underserved populations.
The grants – up to four $50,000 awards – will allow the health care
organizations to participate in a statewide, health information
technology initiative.
A
foundation representative stated that the grant will help safety net
“health care communities” – including public and rural hospitals,
community clinics and public health departments - plan and implement
health care data exchange programs. These communities may include
health plans as well.
CEO Slyvia Kelly
Testifies for Human Services Committee on Primary Care Case
Management System
In Connecticut, switching to a primary-care case management system
would affect more than 300,000 low-income individuals that are
currently enrolled in the state's HUSKY or other Medicaid health
plans such as the ACAP member Community Health Network of
Connecticut.
Sylvia Kelly, CEO and President of Community Health Network,
testified on January 18, 2007 for Legislators of the Human Services
Committee regarding the success and importance of the HUSKY program.
Ms. Kelly outlined some of the unique and distinctive qualities of
the program:
- HUSKY plans’ goal is to ensure that our members receive
services.
- When a member is enrolled in a HUSKY plan, they each receive
a welcome call from our Outreach staff.
- During the call, the member is assigned a primary care
provider, offered assistance with scheduling an appointment and
are informed that transportation is provided if needed.
- The member is also asked questions to determine their health
status, such as whether they are pregnant or have other medical
needs.
- For example, if a member is pregnant, our Nurse case
managers will monitor the member’s pregnancy, identify risk
factors and work with the member on obtaining prenatal care.
- Outreach staff makes phone calls and sends post card
reminders to members who are due or overdue for preventive
services such as well-care and dental visits. During 2006, HUSKY
plans collectively completed 225,000 outbound calls.
- Every member receives a handbook and other educational
materials describing eligible services and how to access care.
- HUSKY plans also provide ties through relationships with
other organizations who can help members with other needs, such
as housing.
- The results of HUSKY plans’ efforts have shown an
improvement in the EPSDT (Early and Periodic Screening,
Diagnosis and Treatment) scores for the State.
Critics of the HUSKY program might have offered PCCM as an
alternative option due to the recent debate over Freedom of
Information litigation in Connecticut. Sylvia Kelly state that “the
Freedom of Information Commission ruled that the MCOs are performing
a “governmental function” and ordered DSS to amend its contracts
with the MCOs to provide that the MCOs are subject to FOIA. Three of
the MCOs, including CHNCT, appealed the ruling, and the Commission’s
order has been stayed pending appeal. DSS did not appeal, and it has
presented a proposed contract amendment to us.”
Ms. Kelly further testified to the Committee regarding this issue.
She made the following comments on behalf of CHNCT:
- CHNCT is committed to providing DSS and the legislature with
all the information they need to monitor and evaluate Medicaid
managed care.
- As mentioned earlier, we provide encounter data and more
than 100 reports a year to DSS. We are also audited by DSS
annually.
- We have two major problems with the contract amendment
proposed by DSS. One issue with DSS’s proposed contract
amendment is that it does not adequately deal with confidential
information. We have contracts with service providers and
vendors that require us to protect the confidentiality of their
proprietary business information.
- The FOIA statute and the DSS amendment do not give us any
way to assert a trade secret claim directly to the Freedom of
Information Commission if DSS decides to disclose our vendors’
proprietary information. This poses two problems for us: it is
likely to involve us in litigation by vendors who have to try to
protect their trade secrets, and it will make it harder for us
to get national service providers (like our pharmacy benefits
manager) to continue to contract with us for services we need.
They don’t want to risk losing their rights to their
confidential business information.
- Our second issue is that we believe that being subject to
FOIA will substantially increase our costs – both the costs of
providing services and our administrative costs.
- We believe that making all information about our
negotiations with providers and vendors public will make it
harder for us to obtain the best rates we could get otherwise.
That will increase the costs to taxpayers.
- We also believe that responding to FOIA requests will be
costly. We have responded to some requests voluntarily. We’ve
seen how broad and burdensome they can be. It has taken several
days of staff time to identify and compile responsive documents.
We’ve incurred legal costs to make sure that the documents can
be disclosed without violating federal privacy laws or
agreements with providers. It has required special computer
programming to extract data from records that we have. There is
no limit to the number of FOIA requests we can receive. These
administrative costs will add up. As a non-profit organization,
we do not have any resources to absorb these costs.
- We believe tax dollars should be used for medical care
rather than litigation and additional administrative expenses.
|
|
Upcoming Events |
January Events
|